Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Classical Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Misztal, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Durkheim on Collective Memory

Barbara A. Misztal

University of Leicester, bm50{at}le.ac.uk

The paper argues that although Durkheim did not explicitly employ the notion of collective memory, his approach offers a very insightful understanding of the need for historical continuity. Durkheim's belief that every society displays and requires a sense of continuity with the past and that the past confers identity on individuals and groups allows us to see collective memory as one of the elementary forms of social life. The paper presents Durkheim's discussion of commemorative rituals in early societies, where he directly addresses the notion of social memory, which is seen as perpetuated by religious rites and as a means of ensuring shared morality and social cohesion. His conceptualization of the role of law and memory in sustaining organic solidarity is also considered. In conclusion it is discussed whether Durkheim's understanding of social memory provides us with relevant means to interpret social processes of remembering in today's societies.

Key Words: law • memory • morality • the past • religion • rituals

Journal of Classical Sociology, Vol. 3, No. 2, 123-143 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1468795X030032002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Classical SociologyHome page
M. Rosati
Inhabiting No-Man's Land: Durkheim and Modernity
Journal of Classical Sociology, May 1, 2008; 8(2): 233 - 261.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative InquiryHome page
A. Berikoff
Inside Memory: A Story of Living in the Past and Present of a Social and Cultural Movement
Qualitative Inquiry, October 1, 2006; 12(5): 886 - 907.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Classical SociologyHome page
J. J. Chriss
Giddings and the Social Mind
Journal of Classical Sociology, March 1, 2006; 6(1): 123 - 144.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
J. Stepnisky
Global Memory and the Rhythm of Life
American Behavioral Scientist, June 1, 2005; 48(10): 1383 - 1402.
[Abstract] [PDF]